Posted on 03/09/2009 1:20:28 PM PDT by La Enchiladita
Yep, that's about what was said about Johnny boy's story too.
You tell me to stay off ‘YOUR’ threads and then freepmail me?? DO not freepnmail me. I’m not going to read it. Man up and speak if you have something to say or stick with you little petty rules and don’t communicate with me either!
Adios!
They can’t do this without authorization of congress.
Live p*ss?
They need wimmin.
Good. Please stay gone.
Like the old saying goes, Just becauseI was born at night doesn't mean I was born last night.
My point is that my being new here does not diminish the BS quotient of your post. Not one bit.
To accomplish what your post thinks is happening would require a formal treaty between the US & China and then the full Senate would have to approve it, which will never happen unless 2/3 of our Senators suddenly decide that they'd like to end their political careers.
Once again, you need to do more reading.
Citizens have ‘no standing’, as we have recently learned.
What should she read?
Las Vegas Ron - you need a hobby!
No way.
No, you need to so you can grasp that this is BS.
US Constitution, Article II, Section 2
He (The President) shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;
Granting such extensive seizure power to a foreign government would require a treaty for it to be enforceable in the USA.
Maybe if you did a little reading you'd know this and then hoaxes like this one of your would not excite you.
I take it my treasury bonds aren't as good as anyone else's.
...mumbles something rather inflammatory...
"You are not welcome to post to me or to any thread that I post."
This is what AuntB posted to you:
"Yes, we dont know if its true. It is apparent, however, that Hillary offered them something to take on our debt. What else do we have to offer? China is not going to bail us out without getting more than they deserve. SOP."
What did she say that was wrong??
Ninety percent of the “free trade” agreements from the last 20 years or so have been treaties disguised as ‘agreements’ so congress wouldn’t have to be involved.
Since Obama’s cabinet and executive branch picks are from clinton’s old administration, what do you think is different now?
Rush doesn’t want to be in government at all. My signature was just for giggles and it wasn’t serious. Consider it gone.
This would go far beyond the scope of a trade agreement, don’t you think?
If it comes to war, they wouldn't need the bomb, they could just drop people on us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.