To: grey_whiskers
“they used a measurement technique that has an almost imperceptible impact on the experiment”
Almost imperceptible. If one observes, it changes the results. So we only peeked at the particles and it didn’t matter? Werner Heisenberg has a few things to say about that.
19 posted on
03/11/2009 9:08:32 PM PDT by
voveo
To: voveo
So we only peeked at the particles and it didn’t matter? They were also wearing very dark sunglasses when they peeked.
20 posted on
03/11/2009 9:30:25 PM PDT by
The Cajun
(Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
To: voveo
So we only peeked at the particles and it didn’t matter?They assure the particle it was an accident and it should go about doing whatever it was doing beforehand, they won't do it again, they swear.
21 posted on
03/11/2009 9:56:44 PM PDT by
eclecticEel
(I already have a Messiah, I don't need another one.)
To: voveo
If one observes, it changes the results.
Only if they get caught.
You clearly missed quantum-plausible-deniability class!
(c8
22 posted on
03/11/2009 10:08:18 PM PDT by
NonLinear
( If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.)
To: voveo
It only changed each observation
a little, and they compensated for that by doing many runs.
Werner Heisenberg has a few things to say about that.
Cheers!
25 posted on
03/12/2009 4:06:26 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: voveo
If Werner’s mistress had not forced him to get entangled with ... oh, never mind.
32 posted on
03/12/2009 5:12:35 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson