Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ considers ban on bare-it-all 'Brazilian' wax
sfgate ^ | March 19, 2009 | BETH DeFALCO

Posted on 03/19/2009 8:26:46 AM PDT by JoeProBono

New Jersey is drawing the line when it comes to bikini waxing.

The state Board of Cosmetology and Hairstyling is moving toward a ban on genital waxing altogether after two women reported being injured in their quest for a smooth bikini line.

Both women were hospitalized for infections following so-called "Brazilian" bikini waxes; one of the women has filed a lawsuit, according to Jeff Lamm, a spokesman for New Jersey's Division of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the cosmetology board.

Technically, genital waxing has never been allowed — only the face, neck, abdomen, legs and arms are permitted — but because bare-it-all "Brazilians" weren't specifically banned, state regulators haven't enforced the law.

"The genital area is not part of the abdomen or legs as some might assume," Lamm said.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bikini; newjersey; onehandbrigade; waxing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Genital waxing can be dangerous in that the hot wax can irritate or tear delicate skin in the bikini area, resulting in infections, ingrown hairs and rashes, according to skin care experts.

1 posted on 03/19/2009 8:26:46 AM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
delicate skin in the bikini area
2 posted on 03/19/2009 8:28:34 AM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Well, New Jersey is the Garden State.


3 posted on 03/19/2009 8:30:31 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Sigh, I see a rash of back alley bikini waxes in the near future.


4 posted on 03/19/2009 8:30:54 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (All Hail Our Dear Leader..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Anytime you hear news like this, look who stands to benefit.

Likely some State Board “Approved” (read - donors) Hair Removal “Specialists”.


5 posted on 03/19/2009 8:31:30 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Are they kidding?!? Brazilian waxing rules! It’s totally not dangerous if done properly. A friend of mine is an aesthetologist and does plenty of them. She says that the only downside is some redness and sensitivity of the skin for up to 24 hours afterward, but the results are definitely worth it.


6 posted on 03/19/2009 8:31:31 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Two Kids' Dad ---- (T) - CA ** Join the "T" party ** ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

They could call it a camel toe pedicure.


7 posted on 03/19/2009 8:33:31 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Waxing should be readily available and free ;)

I watched 1984 the other day, I had forgotten about the female full frontal. I almost barfed! Then I thought, now I remember why it was called beaver.

Anyway, I’m all for waxing!


8 posted on 03/19/2009 8:34:06 AM PDT by arealconservativeforachange (Tell JD Hayworth to run for McCain's seat! http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Ugh. Will they consider wearing clothes, if they can’t have a “Brazilian wax,” or will they just be hairy?


9 posted on 03/19/2009 8:34:08 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Even for a thin-skinned solipsistic narcissist, Obama seems a frightful po-faced pill." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

a RASH is right! OUCH!


10 posted on 03/19/2009 8:34:18 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

I see marchs, with womyn waving coathan...err, Bic razors?!?!?


11 posted on 03/19/2009 8:35:30 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Obama Speeches--TeleprompterInChief--TIC Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I have done hundreds of them. Never had a problem. You do need a skilled waxer. I am good at what I do. I also wax men as well.

This is the main money maker of any salon if they have a good skilled staff.


12 posted on 03/19/2009 8:36:07 AM PDT by waxer1 ( Live Free or Die; Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad

LIkely depends on your skin type. You must have tough skin... ;)


13 posted on 03/19/2009 8:36:35 AM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

14 posted on 03/19/2009 8:37:34 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
-b-
15 posted on 03/19/2009 8:38:14 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

When waxing is illegal, only criminals will go Brazilian.


16 posted on 03/19/2009 8:38:55 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arealconservativeforachange

17 posted on 03/19/2009 8:40:28 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad

I would place money on the bet that sensitivity/redness lasts longer than 24 hours. It has to do the the depth of the follicle. That’s all I have to add...


18 posted on 03/19/2009 8:40:35 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Obama Speeches--TeleprompterInChief--TIC Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Aside from the 'sensitive' nature of this thread, please note that NJ legislators are talking about banning this procedure because two people had bad reactions.

That is an over-reach.

19 posted on 03/19/2009 8:40:54 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (I want President Obama AND his policies to fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
"The genital area is not part of the abdomen or legs as some might assume," Lamm said.

Now THERE'S a man who knows his human anatomy.

Now, about the "some" who might "assume"...

20 posted on 03/19/2009 8:41:33 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson