I don’t think you understand what I said. Clerks and such falsified court actions and forged justices signatures. Try reading the link I added in my post.
Oh, please.
Orly is merely showing her ignorance of how the Supreme Court works. As I pointed out at the time her cases were calendared for conference before the Supreme Court-- and got flamed for doing so-- the fact that a case is listed for conference doesn't mean it actually gets discussed. Every case filed with the Supreme Court gets listed for conference. That means dozens and dozens of cases are listed for conference on the same day. (Check the Supreme Court's on-line docket and you will see.) Before the conference, each Justice circulates a list (not made public) of which cases they want to discuss. Any case not put on the "discuss list" by any Justice is never discussed and is denied automatically, even though it was listed for conference.
So it is no wonder that Justices don't seem to remember Orly's cases-- all were denied without a single recorded dissent, which means they most likely were not discussed. (Again, I pointed this out on FR at the time, and got flamed for saying so.)
Even if a case had been discussed in conference, the Justices would never discuss it in public.
So when Orly is making wild claims that the Justices' signatures were forged on the orders denying her cases, just because they don't remember those cases, she is only hurting her credibility with the Court for her next filing.