Per the article, they don’t even know who exactly this guy is, but they know his motives? This sounds like a whitewash. It could easily be an educated technology worker ticked off that we’re letting more and more immigrants in to do hi-tech jobs and pushing out older folks who make more money.
It’s just awful fishy that they know nothing about the guy or even his name, but they already know that it’s “our” fault for being intolerant. hmmm...
Not condoning the actions in any way or suggesting I know the truth either. Condolences to the families.
But this has government, media spin written all over it. If he’s been in the country for 20+ years or has a parent that works in the U.S. it’s more likely that he got along just fine. If he’s ticked off about the language and not being able to find a job, wouldn’t he shoot up IBM? or the unemployment office? just thinking out loud.
Excellent point. Apparently, a dead man’s thought can be learned quicker than his identity.... at least in the media’s investigation.
This is a case where the headline writer should be shot. In the article, the police chief says “We have no idea what the motive is.” Since the world would like to know the motive, it would have been more responsible to say “Police chief says no motive found yet.”