Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking

Yep, but on a side note...
wouldn’t he have been guilty of animal cruelty if he’d NOT let the rabbit go because it had outgrown its cage?


6 posted on 04/29/2009 8:23:20 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

The only correct action would have been to apply at local DNC headquarters for a bunny-cage bailout. They’re bailing out humans with their houses. Not to do so in this case would be discrimination against Bunny-Americans.


24 posted on 04/29/2009 8:38:08 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark
wouldn’t he have been guilty of animal cruelty if he’d NOT let the rabbit go because it had outgrown its cage?

TRUE. So the obvious and humane thing to do is to kill it and eat it.

58 posted on 04/30/2009 12:42:18 AM PDT by roamer_1 (It takes a (Kenyan) village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson