Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HiJinx

The Constitution requires that owners of private property taken for public use be compensated.

Protection of the border is obviously a perfectly legitimate public use, but compensation is still required.


11 posted on 05/10/2009 12:54:51 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

The thing that truly bothers me is that there is apparently no easement already in effect along the entire length of the border.

In my mind this is clearly a case of eminent domain; inasmuch, as you mentioned, border security is the reason for the need for an easement.


12 posted on 05/10/2009 1:06:36 PM PDT by HiJinx (~ Support Our Troops ~ www.AmericaSupportsYou.mil ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson