Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Another good comment found on NRO. Add Detroit for a merry threesome, grunting away in blissful ignorance of the folks hiding under the bed.

Link to McArdle's article in Steyn post at NRO - not sure how to transfer the link.

1 posted on 05/20/2009 7:53:47 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
It's as if California and New York have burst their bodices like two corpulent gin-soaked trollops and rolled over the fruited plain to rub bellies at the Mississippi.

That's a mental picture I could have done without.

2 posted on 05/20/2009 7:55:35 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

“Not to be too gloomy, but the country feels like it’s seizing up. It’s as if California and New York have burst their bodices like two corpulent gin-soaked trollops and rolled over the fruited plain to rub bellies at the Mississippi. If you’re underneath, it’s not going to be fun.”

What a way with words! I love this guy. Thanks for posting. :)


3 posted on 05/20/2009 7:56:29 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
I see a silver lining in this dark cloud. It will hasten the States Rights revolution.
4 posted on 05/20/2009 7:56:50 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Passing Sacramento's buck to Washington will accelerate the centralizing pull in American politics and eventually eliminate any advantage to voting with your feet.

This is true of course but Steyn could have easily added the fact that it will allow the Sacramento Thieves to continue on their spending binge with the bill to be paid by Obama. This is the solution to California's lament that it can't print money. Well, as we will see, it can via a surrogate in Washington D.C.

5 posted on 05/20/2009 7:57:46 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

“The swimsuit round”

LMAO, Steyn always has that quintessential point of the knife to stick in.


6 posted on 05/20/2009 7:59:18 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

The swimsuit round!! But there will be no Miss Congeniality.


7 posted on 05/20/2009 8:01:50 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

There really ought to be some creative ways for productive states to divorce the coasts. Perhaps TX, OK, LA and AK should stop shipping all oil and gas products to these states that are at the forefront of blocking domestic oil and gas production. Other states may want to stop shipping grain and meat products to states that are enemies of modern agriculture.
After all, urban areas are dependent on rural areas for basic necessities of life. There is absolutely no reason for producers to continue to wear the “Kick Me” signs as the PETA/Sierra Club whiners get their punitive agendas passed by their allies in D.C.


8 posted on 05/20/2009 8:02:33 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
"we now move on to the swimsuit round, in which the Golden State's woes are federalized and redistributed to the nation at large."

"DeFacto", this has already taken place. Michigan's Governor Granholm used about $800 million in Federal Stimulus dollars to balance the 2008-2009 budget and there are already plans to use more stimulus money for the 2009-2010 budget. Then she term limits out and the stimulus money is gone. Then she comes back and runs for Senator and says things weren't as bad when she was Governor. And the incredibly uninformed "citizens" of Michigan will buy it lock, stock and barrel of crap. Where is our media and education system?

10 posted on 05/20/2009 8:07:53 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
While the fiscal fate of the two liberal-dominated basket cases on either American coast is fine fodder for humorous commentary (and there are few better than Mark Steyn to provide the levity), I am growing increasingly concerned about the consequences.

What do you suppose the fallout might be if California and New York (and perhaps Massachusetts and others) essentially declared bankruptcy and applied to the Federal government for a "bailout"? If you are not so unfortunate as to live in one of these terminally-mismanaged states, you may wind up even more unfortunate in being asked to pay for their folly and profligacy in the form of higher taxes and interest rates.

Like Mr. Stein, I live in New Hampshire, and in no way do I intend to pay to clean up California's mess. Federalism still means something (I think), and I would hope the residents of most states would feel the same way. Now, that would be a tax revolt to remember.

11 posted on 05/20/2009 8:10:47 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

I’m in California and I want our state to fail. No bailout from the feds. I want every politician in Sacramento who voted for enlarging our already-obese government to suffer the blame and shame of being at fault for our state’s bankruptcy. Heck, this state’s been morally bankrupt for years. Might as well let the fiscal bankruptcy occur and maybe the voters will send the culprits packing back home with their tails between their legs.

Arnold is no better than Gray Davis. In some ways he’s worse.


16 posted on 05/20/2009 8:34:03 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

If the federal government is going to illegally and unconstitutionally bail out the states, we might as well tear up the document and just let Obama do whatever he wants. Freedom and the rule of Law means nothing at that point.


17 posted on 05/20/2009 8:38:19 AM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Hey Arnold, how’s that governing from the middle working out for you? Now, wher is that Megan chic that keeps telling me the that the GOP needs to govern from the middle......


23 posted on 05/20/2009 9:03:54 AM PDT by CSM (Business is too big too fail... Government is too big to succeed... I am too small to matter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

California didn’t vote no to taxes. They just voted no to them paying them.


26 posted on 05/20/2009 9:39:34 AM PDT by jdub (A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson