Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nateriver
I am a health insurance agent.
I have a $5,000 deductible plan.
It costs, roughly, $100.00 per month.
I am 50 years old, a male, and a non smoker.

This is what almost EVERYONE should do.

It is not the purpose of insurance to cover EVERYTHING, anymore than home owners insurance should buy your light bulbs or paint your house!

2 posted on 06/22/2009 9:22:58 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

Is that $5,000 inpatient? If you have $5,000 on both in and out, you must pay for everything plus $100 a month.


3 posted on 06/22/2009 9:26:45 AM PDT by b4its2late (I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
I agree 100% with your approach.

Private Health insurance is the way to go, with some reforms of the industry.

I suspect many Americans, are to cheap to pay their own premiums, and instead rather spend their money on booze, tobacco, and junk foods, then go to the public hospital and expect the rest of us to pay for their bad choices.

6 posted on 06/22/2009 9:37:47 AM PDT by gitmogrunt (The stupidity of the American Liberal never ceases to amaze me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

If I had a $5000 deductible on my health insurance I might as well not have health insurance. At almost 40 I’ve never come close to spending that much (combined out of pocket and insurance) on my healthl.


11 posted on 06/22/2009 10:30:25 AM PDT by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
It is not the purpose of insurance to cover EVERYTHING, anymore than home owners insurance should buy your light bulbs or paint your house!

Hmm . . that definitely is true for most insurance (life, car, home), but health insurance might (I say "might") just be a different animal, especially if someone wants to craft a policy that will help keep long-term costs down (I'm thinking preventive care here).
This being a (supposedly) free country, there should be nothing stopping someone from offering such a policy.

Being able to catch a potentially serious illness in its early stages drastically reduces the overall, or eventual, costs. That should be the goal of healthcare now - get costs under control without sacrificing quality.

24 posted on 06/22/2009 1:27:42 PM PDT by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson