Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2009 10:35:14 AM PDT by D C Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: D C Jones

Hmmmm. Maybe Soros has shorted the dollar and this was going to be the spike he needed to roll up a few more $Billion. Or may I should say a few more Billion Euros.


2 posted on 06/22/2009 10:41:21 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D C Jones

the silence from the US government...is deafening

this was at least as big an attack on the US (via our treasury) as 9-11. The past and present administrations have also been silent over who started and profited from the 18 September 2008 $550 Billon dollar run on cash in our banking system. Congress has been silent. The press has been silent.


3 posted on 06/22/2009 10:52:16 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D C Jones
I've seen a lot of ideas floated on what happened in Italy, who the people were, and what the true nature of the paper is. But I haven't heard any ideas that made any sense at all.

This situation is crazy.

4 posted on 06/22/2009 11:00:40 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D C Jones

This has been a high speculation to facts ratio story since the day it broke.


5 posted on 06/22/2009 11:25:04 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D C Jones
If they actually are real and declared fakes then the US government does not have to pay the debtors.

Only the original buyer can verify their authenticity if questioned. The serial numbers would expose the original buyer.

Either way it goes, declaring them fakes is in the US treasury's best interest.

It would expose the smugglers or devalue the paper without hurting the treasury.

The only negative is if the paper could be proved to be authentic without a doubt.

Big risk for all involved.

6 posted on 06/22/2009 1:05:22 PM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (FDR had the New Deal. President 0bama has the Raw Deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson