Most of the cases regarding BHO’s lack of ability for office have been dismissed because of a lack of standing. Why cannot someone on trial for a federal crime bring a motion which argues the Federal Prosecutors bringing the criminal complaint have no authority since they were not appointed by someone who is qualified to be President. That would be a central fact in the case and I would believe could not be dismissed for lack of standing. What if every defendant involved in a Federal trial across the country raised this argument at the same time. The courts would have to react.
Also, why could not someone who is on trial in front of a judge appointed by BHO claim the judge had no authority.
What if the government tried to collect a debt from a citizen who raised this defense. What if every person in such a civil trial raised the same defense.
What about an action raised by someone directly affected by a law or regulation that was signed by BHO or was enacted or approved by someone appointed by BHO claiming the law or regulation was invalid because of a lack of authority by BHO. What if there were thousands of lawsuits against the validity of any such law or regulation.
Keep up the good fight
See, I agree. I think that a party such as a large corportation could claim that the law they are having to deal with is not valid since it is not signed by a legal president.
Keep those gears turning T3. I think our only salvation as a Republic is to discover this dude a fraud and give him a ticket home. I’m praying someone will step forth to bring about an end this nightmare. Someone like a Churchill or a fact finder that provides the information necessary to rid our Republic of this destructive Kenyan and his power structure and supporters.
That’s actually a good idea. But, they would have to bring their cases to the DC Dsistrict Court and to also file Quo Warranto documents.