This case had connections to the recent US child porn bust code name Shattered Innocence. The press don’t want to have any healing debate going on around these issues. What gets me is that it isn’t just where homosexuality is concerned but all sexual issues except of course the ones which they can’t avoid reporting (like Edwards and horn dog Clinton). They will not be honest where homosexuality and gay rights is concerned. The cost of the brave new sexual permissive society that is being driven largely by the sexual activism of the left is costing billions in health care cost, social welfare cost, etc far exceeding the cost of such popular bugbears as tobacco and illegal drug use.
It isn’t even that all homosexuals fit this profile. The problem is very many do. The interesting thing I always found is that the lopsided nature of male and female homosexuality mirrors other sexual disorders. Males whether it be criminal or non criminal sexual disorder always show a much higher incidence than women. Incidental homosexuality though is increasing among young women due to the permissive nature of today’s society and the pressure from men on campuses for a little “girl on girl” action and such as well as open predatory lesbianism that is tolerated and also almost never reported.
I agree. I believe that most homosexuals are as offended by this as we are... But I wonder why the gay community isn't condemning this ... Why aren't we hearing their voices?
Lots of gays work in the media - why aren't they front and center on this issue?
Those reporters would be out there en mass if it was a Southern Baptists Minister caught doing this - or a Republican - or a teacher at a Christian College.
Why the double standard? Do they believe it's OK for liberals to rape children but not for conservatives to rape children?
Or is the bias and hatred so ingrained in our media that rapists who sell children get passes if they belong to powerful dem lobby groups like gays?
The "press" avoided the Edwards story all the way up until a picture was published of him holding his love child.
The same ( not so believable ) press was ready to string up Monica and her mother as being "crazy" until the appearance of the "blue dress".
The press had no intention of covering either of those stories honestly - if they could they would have lied for the dems and hurt the innocent people who were telling the truth. Both for Edwards and for Clinton.
The MSM was forced to be truthful by overwhelming PROOF. It's sad - there was a time when I looked up to our free press. Now I'm just disgusted.