Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand; Checkers
If this "lormand" wants to gauge the opinion that FREEPERS have of "Weiner", then he is quite obviously free to do so on his own."

Good one stranger! I notice you conveniently see this as a one sided issue.

You issued a challenge to a FREEPER, who, obviously, does not have to engage in such a challenge WHATSOEVER. Not only that, but another FREEPER, who, obviously, "conveniently sees this as a one sided issue" (checkers) is goading....on your behalf.

Next.

110 posted on 07/02/2009 10:27:26 PM PDT by period end of story (Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: period end of story; whatisthetruth; Checkers
You speak for other Weinerzombies I see?

Why not let WITT speak for him/her/it self? Wouldn't it be helpful for the Weiner cause to defend his words and actions rather than place yourself in someone else's battle?

Do you guys never tire of getting pwn'd?

111 posted on 07/06/2009 8:14:51 AM PDT by lormand (Michael Wiener - faux Conservative, money bag for California democRATs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson