Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Waffles
Well thank you for the small novel about how dogs kill more owners than snakes. First, I'm pretty sure you are wrong if you consider there are far more dogs as pets than snakes. But, even if you are right there is a significant difference: Dogs are domesticated and snakes are always wild.

That having been said, I'm not sure where you got the idea that I think snakes should be banned. I couldn't care less if people own them as long as they are responsible for their actions. I would agree, since a snake is wild they should require a permit and maybe an inspection of the cage, but definitely if the snake hurts or kills someone the owner is responsible.

Other than that, just because I don't like snakes or other reptiles, it doesn't mean I think they should be banned.

I would support a negligent manslaughter charge against this hapless couple.

128 posted on 07/02/2009 7:25:16 PM PDT by politicalmerc (NObama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: politicalmerc

Sorry about the nerd-rage there.

I guess the topic just bugs me cause I know lots of people that own things that other people want banned, such as guns, reptiles, and large dogs, etc. and I hate these stories that make all owners of such things seem like stupid and irresponsible people. Sucks how a few bad apples can ruin the bunch.

The negligent manslaughter charge sounds good.


134 posted on 07/02/2009 8:12:14 PM PDT by Waffles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson