Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA
"I guess my question is in the over-optimism of reports here, that the case will proceed on its merits. I don’t think that that has been established, only that there is a judge who is paying attention, who said he’d give it his full consideration, and who will not allow a dismissal on purely technical grounds."

And that's all we need for exuberant celebration! God bless Dr. Orly Taitz and Judge Carter!

243 posted on 07/14/2009 12:15:32 AM PDT by matthew fuller (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: matthew fuller

My point, or my question, was about the headline of this thread and what the judge actually said vs. what the blogosphere reports in its echo chamber. I can’t imagine a judge saying a case will be tried on its merits before an answer is filed. That just doesn’t ring true.

Getting Obama served thru the US attorneys negates Dr. Taitz’s getting the default, which would conceivably lead to the discovery she seeks. So that’s a pyrrhic victory.

Once the answer is filed, you KNOW they will move to dismiss on a variety of legal grounds. That will invite a round or two of briefing. The judge could conclude from those briefs that there are or are not grounds to proceed.
But I’d bet dollars to donuts that he did NOT say that the case will now proceed on its merits.

I hate to be the skunk at the garden party, but we’ve been led down the rosy lane a few times too often. I’ll hold off celebrating until I can read the transcript of today’s hearing, and then Judge Carter’s issuing a Scheduling Order to include discovery.


249 posted on 07/14/2009 12:36:43 AM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson