Glad you asked. I first had to prove that the "scan image" and the "photos" were never made from a real document. Had I simply made a statement about what he said to me, my critics would have a field day, saying it never happened and calling me a liar.
HOWEVER, now that I had conclusive, irrefutable, concrete evidence that the COLB was never a real document, adding Onaka's comments to the mix served to underscore my research finding.
There will still be fools who will call me a liar, but there will less people listening to them now.
Isn’t it interesting that the DOH people answered Danae’s questions over the phone? If her mother made the request for the COLB, then why would they research the production of it for someone else? Danae isn’t her mother. Danae isn’t the person who made the request. Besides which, how do they know who they’re talking to over the telephone? It could be anyone professing to be Danae. If we believe Danae, they answered her over the phone concerning the date that her COLB was requested. Therefore, they do have this information on file and it’s not “private,” if they give the information out to a person who simply calls and asks for it.
On the second page of comments, sombody posted images of Danae’s COLB and what is supposedly Obama’s. Yet the date on Danae’s is 3/2007 and the date on the other one is June 2008. Neither matches Obama’s posted COLB, unless I’m mistaken. What’s up, if you know?