Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: autumnraine; LucyT; MHGinTN; Fred Nerks; null and void; BP2

Where is that statement from his attorney because if that is the case, they are admitting that the one they presented is a fraud.
_____________
“His attorney’s stated that he doesn’t want to show it because it would be embarrassing. “It was posted on here somewhere. It was his attorney’s reply to one of the court cases. Anyone know which post that was on or have that information?


162 posted on 07/16/2009 11:15:52 AM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: mojitojoe
It just seems odd that Obama could not get cleared to play in a Little League game with that COLB, but he can be elected POTUS.

Of course, maybe that's why he never played baseball as a kid. he couldn't provide a proper birth certificate!

163 posted on 07/16/2009 11:20:01 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: mojitojoe
Obama's Birth Certificate a "serious embarrassment" Source?
166 posted on 07/16/2009 11:32:29 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 177 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: mojitojoe

I’m trying to track down the source of that statement:

“...The Obama team contented itself with a motion to dismiss the case and a protective order, but there has yet to be a ruling on this, perhaps to the surprise and chagrin of Obama and the DNC. Obama’s lawyers in these motions, argued that revealing the information (birth certificate, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They say revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” The source of that embarrassment was not specified...

http://israelinsider.ning.com/profiles/blogs/2018399:BlogPost:10858

Looks like it originated with Berg.


167 posted on 07/16/2009 3:19:10 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: mojitojoe

Heresay, until we find Berg’s original statement:

“During the Berg lawsuit to force the release of Obama’s longform, “vault” birth certificate, his lawyers argued that revealing the information (birth cert, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They argued that revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” The source of that embarrassment was not specified; but it is clear he is hiding something he doesn’t want the country to know.”

http://opengov.ideascale.com/akira/dtd/4845-4049


168 posted on 07/16/2009 3:38:14 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson