What recent revelation? Fukina's? Is Fukina some sort of deity? Here you are in your own vanity piece talking about Fukina being "under duress". But if she is "under duress", how can you believe anything she may state at all? People under duress are not known for telling the truth.
Specifically, why do you believe Fukina's statement to the effect that his "original vital records" confirm that he was born in Hawaii, when you indicated that she could be referring to an "amended original document" (whatever the heck that is - sounds like an oxymoron to me)? Could not the original document have been amended to change the place of birth just as easily, if not more so, as it could have been amended to change the name. You speculate on the latter, yet you unequivocally deny any possibility of the former!
BTW, what expertise does Fukina have to be an authority on the meaning of the "natural born citizen" clause in the Constitution?
I know that it's tough for a devout Clintonista to be logical in thought, but maybe you can explain this.
I don’t disagree with anything you said. And I don’t believe I said I know what the truth is. I don’t, that’s why we’re here.