Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanVictory
It is true that in the opinion of which you speak its says, as you say, that such a one is as much a “citizen” as one who is a naturally born citizen but it does not say that such a one is a “natural born citizen.”

"The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle. "

The phrase, "as much a citizen" means that the person in question is "as much" a natural born citizen as a person who had two U.S. citizen parents.

"As much as" means "Equal To" and equal to means the very same.

Moreover, the Justices did not say "if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of two citizens....."

Instead, they said "if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen..."

Obama has one parent who was a citizen.

92 posted on 07/31/2009 6:19:55 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

I disagree. I don’t think your reading of the phrase to is correct and there is no evidence that the Supreme Court has ever adopted such a position or for that matter any other court. If the Supreme Court had wanted to say that such a person is a “natural born citizen” it would have said so; instead it said that such a person is as much a “citizen” as a natural born person is. It thus deliberately contrasted the two different phrases. Your interpretation is strained.


95 posted on 08/01/2009 5:59:06 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson