Replies

As weird/misguided Gore is, I think even HE would be a better choice than Obama or Biden; Gore, I believe, has no desire to destroy the US, either intentionally or unintentionally.

Quayle is a good solid man, as far as that goes, from everything I’ve seen/heard about him.

>I already know how they would do it in the USA and according to the Constitution.

As long as we’re on the topic of acting according to the Constitution I have a few questions regarding treason:
1) If slandering and demoralizing troops acting in a battlefield, condemning them on national tv, and subsequently validating the claims made enemies of the US (even though such condemnation was later found to be false) then why hasn’t John Murtha been tried for treason?
2) If treason is adhering to the enemies of the US, or giving aid and comfort to the same, then wouldn’t the abridgment of people’s rights on behalf of a traitor be treasonous itself?
3) Given that an individual legislator’s job is not to determine the guilt/innocence, and also that a legislator cannot be fired, then how could the courts rule that a law protecting federal employees in execution of their office from civil suit applied to Murtha in the above instance?
4) Given the massive fraud wherewhich an ineligible person would be ‘elected’ president, should Obama be found ineligible; how can we be sure that ANY public official is indeed eligible for that office? Further, that would amount to Conspiracy Against Rights (USC title 18, pt 1, Ch 13, sec 241) which is a possibly Capital crime and it would be FOOLISH to allow ANYONE the power to pardon those involved when we don’t know who IS involved. That is to say that should there be a conspiracy then anyone with ANY possibility of being involved should not hold that power. (Blaise Pascal said: “It is not permitted for even the most equitable of men to be a judge in their own cause.” in part due to the judicial power that judges have traditionally held; however, a judge could also [traditionally] drop the case or pardon the perp... though pardoning the perp might anger the people to the point of killing an unjust judge.)

Let me put the question to you this way: Who would you TRUST to hold the office of president? Especially taking into account that there would/should be investigation and trials for MANY people in political power right now on the very subject? {ie Who can we trust not to [ab]use “Presidential Pardon”?}

>How do you see things going in ‘Make it up as you go along Land’?

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

We shall see.