Pelosi Signed two Obama Certifications of Nomination DNC , Left Out Provision.

Sodahead ^ | September 8, 2009 | Defendusx

[opentalk]

Pelosi signed two Official Certifications of Nomination for Obama and Biden at the DNC Convention last August. Read the language carefully and note the difference between them:

Second one without any reference to the constitution.

[opentalk]

WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?

[AliVeritas]

I sent this out way back.

Belated welcome to FR.

[gwilhelm56]

Simple ... to a LIBERAL, Constitution is a 4 letter word. Same as Crucifix to a Vampire.

[savedbygrace]

The graphic is too small to read.

[combat_boots]

0bama...
No pledge
No reference to the flag
Additional oaths of office—at least one of which was in private

Nanzi...
No patriotic music while on hold at the Capitol
No reference to the US Constitution in the one document from last August.

How many people are in on the fix to kill off the US?

[combat_boots]

You’re right. You can right-click and copy it and then paste it into Wordpad or something as an image & enlarge it from there (although it’s fuzzy). The Constitution is referenced at the end of the darker one.

So, the DNC is in on this usurpation.

[dools007]

Was there ever any doubt?

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[STARWISE]

You can see them clearly here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=8379#8379

Then read this:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For example, HRC won the popular vote.

(Did you already know that?)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

(Not at all surprising, since even on election day, polls taken of people who had just cast their votes showed she would have beaten John McCain by 11 percentage points, as opposed to BO’s 7.) http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/11/12/politics/horserace/entry4596620.shtml

Plus, even with all of the documented caucus fraud and the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee bait and switch with MI votes; best guesses, BO still only managed to ‘find’ less than 35 more pledged delegates as the result of votes cast for him, than for her.

http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm; http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_delegate_count.html.

(A federal court ruling in TX has allowed a lawsuit to proceed based on the under-allocation of delegates in heavily Hispanic districts, which could signal the beginning of the end to the D’s ‘complicated’ delegate allocation process in that state.)

http://www.star-telegram.com/texas/story/1558681.html

Okay. We previously established there is no correlation between the votes cast for BO by the Electors in the Electoral College; and the appearance of his name on the general election ballot.

And we have just established there is NO correlation between winning the Democratic primary contest and garnering the Democratic nomination.

Then why do you suppose Chairwoman Pelosi imposed measures that were guaranteed to gag the ‘fair reflection’ of the millions of voters who had dispatched delegates to the Convention, in order to guarantee BO the nomination?

Repeat after me: The raison d’etre for awarding BO the national D party nomination was to get elections officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to print his name next to the D on the general election ballot.

And, according to state elections laws, only the candidate duly nominated by the national D party at the party Convention, as Certified to by the party, is entitled to have his or her name printed on state ballots for the general election.

But didn’t we just say, the actual election occurs within the EC, and not at the general election?

Then, why were Nancy Pelosi (and Howard Dean and Harry Reid) determined to get BO’s name on the ballot in the general election? Because they could never have gotten away with stealing the election at the point of the EC vote, when most people think they are actually casting their votes for President in the general election.

As we’ve already said, in order to get the state to print the name of the nominee for POTUS from the major political party, onto the state’s general election ballot, appropriate party officials must Certify to state elections officials, the name of the nominee of the party.

But in some states, for example, TX and GA, just Certifying the name of the candidate is not enough to get his or name printed onto the ballot.

The law in those states says to get onto the ballot, the party nominee must also satisfy all of the qualifications of the job. But, even in those states that mandate the nominee must be eligible, there’s no law that says, the party must Certify the nominee’s qualifications.

Of course, since DNC rules require the nominee must be eligible under the Constitution, http://s3.amazonaws.com/apache.3cdn.net/3e5b3bfa1c1718d07f_6rm6bhyc4.pdf (p.14, K.1 and 2), Certifying BO is the nominee is tantamount to verifying, he is Constitutionally eligible for the job. Anyway, there’s no law in any state that says any state official has to check.

However, 1 (one) state in the union enacted a law that specifically says, the party must Certify the nominee for POTUS is eligible for the job: HI.

So, in her civilian role as Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, Nancy Pelosi, possessing all of the gravitas of the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives signed the DNC’s Official Certification of Nomination relied upon by state elections officials to print the name of Barack Obama on the state general election ballots.

And on the Certification issued to the state of HI, Ms. Pelosi added this line: he is “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/if-drowning-out-opposing-facts-is-un-american-then-ignoring-unpleasant-facts-must-be-un-american-too/

But as we now know, there is no evidence she determined beforehand whether he was Constitutionally eligible for the job. http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/rumors-lies-and-unsubstantiated-facts/; http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/if-drowning-out-opposing-facts-is-un-american-then-ignoring-unpleasant-facts-must-be-un-american-too/

Which leads us to the final question:

In July of 2007, why do you suppose Howard Dean picked Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, 3rd in the line of Presidential succession, to Chair the 2008 DNC Convention?

Answer: Perhaps to guarantee no matter the success achieved by other candidates seeking the D nomination, BO would still win the 2008 election.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/3/usc_sec_03_00000019—-000-.html

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/

~~~~~

Wonder if Hillary’s enjoying the deal she made.

[MestaMachine]

“Wonder if Hillary’s enjoying the deal she made.”

Yes,she is, Starwise, because she made the deal for her own reasons. obama is the one getting beat up, not her, even though these are HER policies. She is not getting her hands dirty.
o will be gone. HER policies will be in place. And SHE will “rescue” the democrats from oblivion.
At least that is what she thinks.

[Nachum]

The list, ping

[MestaMachine]

Obviously because he didn’t/doesn’t meet the Constitutional requirements to run for, much less BE, president of this great country.
Pelosi is a traitor. She should have been charged when she carried out secret negotiations with Syria and Iran and the PKK.

[opentalk]

Thanks, good information.

I noticed in the certificate of nomination Obama’s middle name is not used.

[null and void]

His original senate home page listed it as “J”. probably just a typo...

[etraveler13]

LISTEN UP CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS. IF YOU PASS THIS HEALTHCARE BILL AGAINST THE WISHES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR JOBS IN 2010.
TODAY WAS THE FIRST SALVO IN THE FIGHT AGAINST OBAMA IN THE COURT SYSTEM. IT WILL BE HEARD ON ITS MERITS TO DETERMINE IF OBAMA IS QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT.

MAKE NO MISTAKE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AMERICA DOES NOT WANT THIS HEALTH CARE PLAN SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS. IF YOU TRY, YOU DO SO AT THE COST OF YOUR JOBS.

IF OBAMA IS FOUND TO BE A FRAUD, HE WILL BE REMOVED, AND THIS LEGISLATION WILL NEVER HAVE HAPPENED. YOU WILL HAVE SEALED YOU FATE, SIDING AGAINST YOUR CONSTITUENTS.

Do not say that you have not been warned. We are pissed off, we have told you we are pissed off, and do not want this to happen. If you don’t listen, you have only yourselves to blame.

You, do not represent YOU, you represent US, if you have forgotten, let me remind you.

Listen to the people you represent, or be tossed out on your ass...

That clear enough?