Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat

‘Xu Xing is one of the scientists who originally examined Archaeoraptor. As we go to press, researchers in the U.S. report that CT scans of the fossil seem to confirm the observations cited in his letter. Results of the Society-funded examination of Archaeoraptor and details of new techniques that revealed anomalies in the fossil’s reconstruction will be published as soon as the studies are completed.’ - Response to Xu Xing, National Geographic 197(3), March 2000

The ‘observations cited’ were Xu Xing’s admission that the Archaeoraptor was a composite hoax. This was determined after National Geographic, and many other publications, hailed this as a genuine fossil before the examinations of it had been completed. Xu Xing was part of the National Geographic team working on this fossil, but apparently hadn’t examined it before publication.

Given the history here, it makes me wonder how thoroughly this fossil has been ‘vetted’ before they rushed to press.


19 posted on 09/27/2009 7:45:25 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
Too many scientists get too giddy when they first hear some news. Some level of excitement over the possibility is fine, but it's dumb to print anything conclusive until a full investigation has been done. That's how publications like NG end up with egg on their faces. Sad, and I grew up on NG. I don't read it anymore.
23 posted on 09/27/2009 9:26:31 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson