To: grey_whiskers
I am pretty sure it was more than radio carbon dating. It is not like they were close and the vote was 3 for and 4 against.
30 posted on
10/08/2009 12:32:49 PM PDT by
Nikas777
(En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
To: Nikas777
I am pretty sure it was more than radio carbon dating. It is not like they were close and the vote was 3 for and 4 against. Science is not determined by voting.
Have you been to either of these two websites?
shroud.com
shroudstory.com
Cheers!
39 posted on
10/08/2009 2:33:08 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Nikas777
“I am pretty sure it was more than radio carbon dating. It is not like they were close and the vote was 3 for and 4 against.”
I’m pretty sure you’re not all that familiar with the debate.
51 posted on
10/08/2009 6:47:28 PM PDT by
Pelham
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson