Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Someone Listening To Your Cell Phone Calls???????
LiveLeak ^ | 9/19/2009 | Me

Posted on 11/19/2009 7:25:47 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: brityank
That is so creepy and I love it! lol!

"They" are watching you - Whatever you do, DON'T click here!

41 posted on 11/19/2009 8:44:02 PM PST by Marie (Is there a crack smoking epidemic in the media that I was unaware of? It was TERRORISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Can you hear me now ???


42 posted on 11/19/2009 9:23:07 PM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

If anyone is dumb enough to listen to my cell phone calls they should get a life...


43 posted on 11/19/2009 10:58:54 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny
If anyone is dumb enough to listen to my cell phone calls they should get a life...

Exactly- just how much info does "Honey, help me get the old dog back in the house" convey?

All the Souper Seekret work I've done is right here- where anyone can search it.

44 posted on 11/20/2009 2:38:21 AM PST by backhoe (All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

We also have religion, but that might not help us out with surveillance, either.


45 posted on 11/20/2009 6:10:17 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
I used to work in the cell phone industry. We used to do it all the time. Saturdays near the big malls were the most fun.
Husbands and wives on their cell phones having fights over the stupidest things.
46 posted on 11/20/2009 6:43:10 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

Some chat-rooms I’ve dropped that into have gone spastic until they understand what it’s really doing. LOL

You can run, but you can’t hide. Everywhere you go, there you are!


47 posted on 11/20/2009 10:17:45 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Minn
You would think the phone companies could block the functionality of spy apps if they wanted to.

We have the technology for secure encrypted cell phone calls. It was blocked first by Bush I and killed dead for all practical purposes by impeached ex-President Clinton's minions Freeh and Reno.

"War on (some) Drug" warriors can look in the mirror to see who is really to blame.

48 posted on 11/21/2009 10:15:41 PM PST by altair (I want him to fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
The Fed.gov “judges” have already ruled that there is legally NO expectation of privacy on wireless devices, though.

Weasel words at best.

That means use a LAND LINE!

What makes you think those are any better? It's not as if you actually need to physically touch a land line to tap phone conversations going across.

The 2nd[1] and 4th amendments are sadly flawed - they don't go far enough. They needed to include secure communications. Unfortunately, the Founding Fathers did not anticipate technology very well.

[1] In case people have forgotten, encryption technology that could have made cell phones private was ruled to be a munition in the early 1990s.

49 posted on 11/21/2009 10:27:13 PM PST by altair (I want him to fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
Maybe you want to make a libertarian ping on this one. We discussed the root cause of this when it was happening on the Cypherpunks mailing list a decade and a half ago.
50 posted on 11/21/2009 10:30:46 PM PST by altair (Cypherpunks write code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Is Someone Listening To Your Cell Phone Calls???????
No.

Not over the air anyway. (This isn't 1993 where most al the networks are using AMPS (Advances Mobile Phone System) technology) which used analog FM on 30 kHz channels that a Radio Shack scanner could pick up. Today's networks ARE digital and threfore over the air encryption capable)

Maybe logged into the switch though, that's a different story. You can also 'track' the phone as it moves/re-registers on different cell sites while on a drive ...

51 posted on 11/21/2009 10:36:02 PM PST by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altair; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
Interesting vid. If privately obtainable software can do this, just imagine what the Gubermint or an over-zealous LEO can do, and probably are on a large scale.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here | DONATE to FreeRepublic NOW!
52 posted on 11/22/2009 7:53:10 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

It’s how dems caught Newt’s conversation years ago... Dems are as dirty as ACORN ...


53 posted on 11/22/2009 8:36:40 AM PST by GOPJ (ObamaCare - slush fund scam that would make Bernie Madoff blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Yes but digital and encrypted are two different things. Casual OTA monitoring is difficult but if an entity is sufficiently determined and financed it is possible.

Of course those entities are usually governments and the telcos just roll over and give them the processed data so OTA monitoring isn't necessary.

54 posted on 11/22/2009 9:58:54 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (MMM MMM MM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: al baby
I have a BC200 that was built before the cell block laws went into full effect. It had what I'll call a courtesy block, which was easily removed. But really what one found on the old analog cell band was just boring IMHO.

Nowadays any spooks looking for real dirt get it straight from the system, and Joe blow doesn't ever get the excitement of happening upon his Congressman's dalliances.

55 posted on 11/22/2009 10:11:21 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (MMM MMM MM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: altair
We have the technology for secure encrypted cell phone calls. It was blocked first by Bush I and killed dead for all practical purposes by impeached ex-President Clinton's minions Freeh and Reno.

"War on (some) Drug" warriors can look in the mirror to see who is really to blame.

Yup. The crypto isn't really all that tough. These days, with modern processor power, you don't even need to have a static private key. (though they would be useful for authentication and to avoid MITM attacks). 

Thanks to all the republican and democrat nanny-staters for making sure we have no privacy from big brother or anyone else.

This stuff should be built into every phone and enabled by default.

56 posted on 11/22/2009 10:33:13 AM PST by zeugma (Raise the IQ of the planet: Nuke mecca during haj.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Holy sh1t!!!!!!!!!!!!


57 posted on 11/22/2009 11:57:28 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Hey wait a minute, acorn are dems, or is it Acorn is dem. ;-]


58 posted on 11/22/2009 12:06:50 PM PST by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Marie
[img]http://www.danasoft.com/sig/InameitFred.jpg[/img]

I wonder if I can make it work too?

59 posted on 11/22/2009 12:27:41 PM PST by Nik Naym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
Obviously not! LOL
60 posted on 11/22/2009 12:28:31 PM PST by Nik Naym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson