Skip to comments.
Is Someone Listening To Your Cell Phone Calls???????
LiveLeak ^
| 9/19/2009
| Me
Posted on 11/19/2009 7:25:47 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: brityank
That is so creepy and I love it! lol!
41
posted on
11/19/2009 8:44:02 PM PST
by
Marie
(Is there a crack smoking epidemic in the media that I was unaware of? It was TERRORISM!)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
42
posted on
11/19/2009 9:23:07 PM PST
by
Lmo56
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
If anyone is dumb enough to listen to my cell phone calls they should get a life...
To: goat granny
If anyone is dumb enough to listen to my cell phone calls they should get a life...Exactly- just how much info does "Honey, help me get the old dog back in the house" convey?
All the Souper Seekret work I've done is right here- where anyone can search it.
44
posted on
11/20/2009 2:38:21 AM PST
by
backhoe
(All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
To: Nervous Tick
We also have religion, but that might not help us out with surveillance, either.
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
I used to work in the cell phone industry. We used to do it all the time. Saturdays near the big malls were the most fun.
Husbands and wives on their cell phones having fights over the stupidest things.
46
posted on
11/20/2009 6:43:10 AM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
To: Marie
Some chat-rooms I’ve dropped that into have gone spastic until they understand what it’s really doing. LOL
You can run, but you can’t hide. Everywhere you go, there you are!
47
posted on
11/20/2009 10:17:45 AM PST
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! Â)
To: Minn
You would think the phone companies could block the functionality of spy apps if they wanted to.We have the technology for secure encrypted cell phone calls. It was blocked first by Bush I and killed dead for all practical purposes by impeached ex-President Clinton's minions Freeh and Reno.
"War on (some) Drug" warriors can look in the mirror to see who is really to blame.
48
posted on
11/21/2009 10:15:41 PM PST
by
altair
(I want him to fail)
To: 2harddrive
The Fed.gov judges have already ruled that there is legally NO expectation of privacy on wireless devices, though.Weasel words at best.
That means use a LAND LINE!
What makes you think those are any better? It's not as if you actually need to physically touch a land line to tap phone conversations going across.
The 2nd[1] and 4th amendments are sadly flawed - they don't go far enough. They needed to include secure communications. Unfortunately, the Founding Fathers did not anticipate technology very well.
[1] In case people have forgotten, encryption technology that could have made cell phones private was ruled to be a munition in the early 1990s.
49
posted on
11/21/2009 10:27:13 PM PST
by
altair
(I want him to fail)
To: bamahead
Maybe you want to make a libertarian ping on this one. We discussed the root cause of this when it was happening on the Cypherpunks mailing list a decade and a half ago.
50
posted on
11/21/2009 10:30:46 PM PST
by
altair
(Cypherpunks write code)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Is Someone Listening To Your Cell Phone Calls???????
No.
Not over the air anyway. (This isn't 1993 where most al the networks are using AMPS (Advances Mobile Phone System) technology) which used analog FM on 30 kHz channels that a Radio Shack scanner could pick up. Today's networks ARE digital and threfore over the air encryption capable)
Maybe logged into the switch though, that's a different story. You can also 'track' the phone as it moves/re-registers on different cell sites while on a drive ...
51
posted on
11/21/2009 10:36:02 PM PST
by
_Jim
(Conspiracy theories are the tools of the weak-minded.)
To: altair; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
52
posted on
11/22/2009 7:53:10 AM PST
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
It’s how dems caught Newt’s conversation years ago... Dems are as dirty as ACORN ...
53
posted on
11/22/2009 8:36:40 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(ObamaCare - slush fund scam that would make Bernie Madoff blush.)
To: _Jim
Yes but digital and encrypted are two different things. Casual OTA monitoring is difficult but if an entity is sufficiently determined and financed it is possible.
Of course those entities are usually governments and the telcos just roll over and give them the processed data so OTA monitoring isn't necessary.
To: al baby
I have a BC200 that was built before the cell block laws went into full effect. It had what I'll call a courtesy block, which was easily removed. But really what one found on the old analog cell band was just boring IMHO.
Nowadays any spooks looking for real dirt get it straight from the system, and Joe blow doesn't ever get the excitement of happening upon his Congressman's dalliances.
To: altair
We have the technology for secure encrypted cell phone calls. It was blocked first by Bush I and killed dead for all practical purposes by impeached ex-President Clinton's minions Freeh and Reno. "War on (some) Drug" warriors can look in the mirror to see who is really to blame.
Yup. The crypto isn't really all that tough. These days, with modern processor power, you don't even need to have a static private key. (though they would be useful for authentication and to avoid MITM attacks).
Thanks to all the republican and democrat nanny-staters for making sure we have no privacy from big brother or anyone else.
This stuff should be built into every phone and enabled by default.
56
posted on
11/22/2009 10:33:13 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Raise the IQ of the planet: Nuke mecca during haj.)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
57
posted on
11/22/2009 11:57:28 AM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: GOPJ
Hey wait a minute, acorn are dems, or is it Acorn is dem. ;-]
58
posted on
11/22/2009 12:06:50 PM PST
by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: Marie
[img]http://www.danasoft.com/sig/InameitFred.jpg[/img]
I wonder if I can make it work too?
59
posted on
11/22/2009 12:27:41 PM PST
by
Nik Naym
To: Nik Naym
Obviously not! LOL
60
posted on
11/22/2009 12:28:31 PM PST
by
Nik Naym
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson