[tired_old_conservative]

Her point is what has been said repeatedly. The courts aren't some King Solomon or other Oracle there to solve whatever is troubling you. You can't just go to them and say “I have a lot of suspicions about some stuff without any actual evidence, and I want you to determine if there is any evidence.” Basically, you have to define an actionable issue with (1) sufficient documentation to demonstrate that cause and purported harm cross the threshold of certain minimum standards, and (2) a definition that fits into the allowable categories the legal process has. To date, no one has done this, which is why all these cases have been dismissed.

[Brown Deer]

To date, no one has done this, which is why all these cases have been dismissed.

WRONG!