[pennyfarmer]

If they had children at home then I do agree they should be there for them. That is defiantly the more important job.

Unless of course you don’t believe that motherhood is a very important job. On that note I would say dish the kids off to a minimum wage worker and pray for the best.

[rbmillerjr]

“If they had children at home then I do agree they should be there for them. That is defiantly the more important job.”

Yeah, your derelection of intelligence and common sense would guarantee that all people involved in politics would be single or married with no kids...lol.

“Brilliant, bumpkin”

[chiefqc]

Well it seems that you have solved the problem of tenn haveing children out of wedlock, have one of the parents stay home.

Well that problem is solved.

Oh wait, are there any out of wedlock children be born to teens or adults who have a parent at home?

Nevermind, the problem still exists.

[papertyger]

If they had children at home then I do agree they should be there for them. That is defiantly the more important job.

Do you have any reason beside Bristol's pregancy to conclude the time spent with her was insufficient?