That’s the problem: on what basis can a free people ban modes of expression that do not create actual hazards or which do not threaten force or inflict fraud? Our Constitution was in fact intended for a moral people, and is dependent for its survival upon one. But the enforcement of such morality must be drawn as narrowly as possible consistent with the fundamental purposes of self-government.
Otherwise, and in time, mere prejudices can come to supplant the objective rule of law.
That is what I like about this place. You occasionally find folks who have not only read their history, they understand what they just read, and they think it's a pretty good idea.
Now... if we can just get more folks on board, we might just celebrate with a Tea Party. ;-)