Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangerdoc
She deserves at least half of what he made while they were married. Husband and wife are a partnership. He broke the rules of the partnership, she should not have to forfeit the benefit of that partnership based on his malfeasance.

She did nothing to earn any of that income. Tiger Woods would have earned that money whether or not he got married.

The vindictive nature of many divorced women is troubling. To want to take as much money as possible and cause as much damage to the ex-husband, is greedy and puts the divorced woman in a negative light.

There are many good reasons why society used to have contempt for the divorcee.

52 posted on 01/26/2010 1:38:05 PM PST by grand wazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: grand wazoo

Believe me, I don’t think she is going to be the one with the PR problem.

When you take the vow, it is for better or worse and carries legal consequences. He got the better for a few years, beutiful children, a photogenic wife who helped him become a more sellable commodity. Now he’s about to get the worse when he has to deal with a pissed ex-wife in divorce court.

He brought this on himself, anger towards his wife is misdirected.


53 posted on 01/26/2010 2:43:37 PM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson