[Southack]

"That would only be true if both processes actually explained the phenomenon. But in this case only the un-aided process explains any of it." - EnderWiggins

Sigh. Incorrect again, I see.

Ender, unaided processes aren't magic. Aided processes can always accomplish the same thing. You are making the same error that the original author of the article for this thread made by assuming that only an unaided process can accomplish some specific feat.

[EnderWiggins]

You continue to miss the point entirely. It is not that aided processes cannot cannot accomplish some of the same things that unaided processes can. It is that only one process actually explains this specific phenomenon. You have certainly not proposed an alternative. Except of course the "dishonest magician" which we both know is not science.