[Southack]

Oh good grief. Your posts get more ridiculus with each attempt. Short repeat DNA is just an observed *pattern* in existing DNA. Sheesh.

Contrary to your machinations, all DNA is code or data. Some of the code is digital (base 4). Other parts of the code are analog (e.g. signaling inputs for replication).

Honestly, you’ve gone too far with your denials and blather. Your mind is made up regardless of facts presented, though no doubt you’ll continue to deny that axiom, too.

[allmendream]

It is indeed an observed pattern, but you insisted it had a function and was part of the “genetic code” which it demonstrably is not as it does not translate into the amino acid sequence of a useful protein.

Only a small percent of the genome is actually made up of DNA that is part of the genetic code or regulatory sequences that control the transcription of that code.