Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Palladin

First of all, I can’t believe I’m boring enough to engage in conversation about toilet paper, but I guess I am.

I actually find Scott to be high quality and strong. I also like the fact that the rolls aren’t so loose that they lose their shape while hanging on the roll. There is a generic brand that is technically cheaper than Scott; but, its quality is terrible.

Sure Charmin Ultra is much stronger (and bulkier which may be bad for my septic system), but it costs triple what Scott does.

I know, I know, toilet paper is an infinitely small portion of my monthly budget, so why not buy the good stuff? I think I would, if it wasn’t wrapped around the roll so loose. Something about the loos fluffy roll really annoys me.


30 posted on 02/05/2010 1:01:46 PM PST by lacrew (Barack Obama is always the least experienced most condescending guy in the room. (Rush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew

Charmin is terrible—it clogs up the newer lowflow toilets.

It is banned from my house forever.


32 posted on 02/05/2010 1:17:57 PM PST by Palladin (TOTUS has bad pronunciation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson