Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GOP_Raider

The definition of autism has been so expanded as to make it a worthless diagnosis. My cousin was diagnosed with it in the 80s so I’m familiar. Every time I see the 1 in 124 stat on commercials I roll my eyes, knowing that too many people are going to believe it.

Autism exists, and it used to have definite symptoms. Now, any child—typically a boy—who has odd behaviors is automatically considered autistic regardless of the symptoms.

Autism today is a diagnosis in search of a symptom.


6 posted on 02/10/2010 1:44:46 PM PST by ElenaM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ElenaM
Autism today is a diagnosis in search of a symptom.

Actually, it's a label in search of federal funding.

9 posted on 02/10/2010 1:47:50 PM PST by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ElenaM

While I was at work on Monday night, I had heard that autism diagnoses had gone up something like 600% in the past 30 years or so (so just a little longer than my own lifetime). Then I got to thinking: isn’t this kind of being over-diagnosed? When I was 7, I had a child psychologist actually say to my parents that I was actually autistic. She was unusually strident about it and about her diagnosis being correct that my parents almost thought about home schooling me from there on out.


15 posted on 02/10/2010 1:58:34 PM PST by GOP_Raider (<----Click over there for a special message from GOP_Raider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson