Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cajuncow
I guess this would also mean that we'll be seeing stronger but fewer earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

Sarc/

6 posted on 02/21/2010 11:44:21 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (If the CIA and NASA are going to "monitor climate change", why the hell do we need the EPA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Here is the funny thing. Big storms are driven by temperature differentials between the poles and the equator. So if global warming is true, we should see greater warming at the poles, which drops the differntial between the poles and equator which should mean less storms and of less intensity. Ironically, that is what we have seen since Katrina, but the global warming people are so wedded to scare stories, that they can’t even latch onto the one thing that can possibly corroborate their predictions, because it doesn’t sound scary enough. (Note: yes I understand the weather is much more complicated than that)


21 posted on 02/21/2010 3:04:36 PM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ...In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson