Replies

Photo 4: Analysis
alt

Enlargement (zooming in) of the above photo again reveals some peculiar anomalies which demonstrate a continuing pattern of obfuscation and fraud. How is it that one is unable to identify certain members of one's own family? The answer to that question is found, first, in considering this photo is an entire composite hoax and never actually occurred at all in realtime.

Barack Obama, Jr. and all other subjects have been compiled into this photo to give the fraudulent representation of a family gathering. Obama's hands appear to be resting on the shoulders of his half-sister, Auma and his grandmother, Kezia. One can see his cupped hands do not look natural—especially his right thumb—and are merely superimposed to look like they are really there. The hand of Abongo (Roy) Obama, his so-called step-brother, rests on Barack's shoulder, while the same hand is holding the hand of an unknown woman. Enlargement reveals that Abongo's right hand has been altered (masked) by photographic editing, showing a large, square pixel in place of the hand.

Again the unknown individual (back row, 2nd from the right) is wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means. The unknown individual (back row, far right) next to him is sporting two-toned trousers, the left leg being powder blue, and the right leg being dark purple. Even the trousers’ inseam on the left leg is purple and is inconsistent with the lack of natural shadows within the entire picture. Nevertheless, that individual's right shoe remains white, while the color of his right pant leg has turned purple.

You are relying on copies of copies. This is a very, very bad copy. There are all sorts of artifacts that are introduced simply by this alone. All of the pixel weirdness is produced by this, not by Photoshop.

Also, you can't even say that the color of one right pantleg is purple. That color also matches someone else's skin on his neck and it also matches the shadowed area of the other pant leg.

The former claim that this guy was wearing two different shoes is also bogus. You see decorations on the inside of the right shoe, but you can't see anything on the outside of the left shoe. Big deal. There's no universal law in shoe manufacturing that outside decorations have to match inside decorations. And for that matter, you can't see the inside part of the left shoe anyway.

As far as Barry's right hand is concerned, a photo is a thin slice of time. If he was moving his thumb as the guy took the picture, you could get something like this. Remember Election with Reese Witherspoon and how the camera was able to freeze-frame certain really, really awkward, dorky, stupid looking expressions that were simply part of normal movement but which are not noticed because they go by so quickly? There is nothing in Barry's hand position that is anything more extreme or unusual than that.

As for the claim that the guy with the donkey shirt has either two different sleeves or a withered arm. Sheesh, that side of his body is in shadow next to the other guy. And you see only a portion of his arm hanging down because it's behind the woman in front of him. The thin width that you see isn't the only portion of his arm that exists.

As far as the claim that the donkey shirt guy is "wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means," do you really mean to put yourself into such a position? Since he is standing BEHIND everyone, the darkness of his clothing cannot hide anything of anyone else. And if this was a composite photo of preexisting photos, then how did he choose anything to "intend" what the creator of the supposed composite photo wanted to accomplish at a date later than when the original photographs were taken?