Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

There is absolutely no reason why Sarah could not win a presidential election, but the MSM and some of their temporary allies with other agendas will do everything in their power to convince you otherwise.

You may be too young to remember the months up to the Reagan nomination, but believe you me, the attitude of the press and of Republican detractors was identical.

He’s dumb, he’s a lightweight, he’s an actor, he’s too old, he’s out of touch, he’s this, he’s that, he’s.... he’s... CONSERVATIVE!!!!

If you change the pronoun and swap out a few words, it’s identical to what people are saying about Sarah. And for very good reasons. Like Ron, Sarah connects with the American people on a genuine level. Like Ron, she is a common sense conservative. Like Ron, she has a warm and self-deprecating sense of humor.

All of these things count. And they all scare the MSM silly, because she goes over their heads with ease and and grace and explains things in words they understand.

They hate that.


2 posted on 03/17/2010 11:20:06 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ronin

“because she goes over their heads with ease and and grace and explains things” in a way that even apolitical swing voters can understand.

You’re right of course. Sarah is the best candidate on the horizon. Just her popularizing of the term “death panels” did more for us in the health care fight than what any ten RINOs have done.


26 posted on 03/18/2010 6:36:38 AM PDT by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson