Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Frantzie

Can’t the courts just say “No legal standing” the way they have done to shut down the Obama citizenship lawsuits?


8 posted on 03/22/2010 6:03:58 AM PDT by a real Sheila (KILL THE BILL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: a real Sheila

That’s what I was going to say. The States have no “standing.” They are just pass-throughs for block grants and other Federal “aid” these days. Lackeys and cringing knaves.


15 posted on 03/22/2010 6:22:12 AM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: a real Sheila

No legal standing?

When they are forcing you to purchase a product against your will, based on your mere existence and under penalty of law and fines, how can you not have legal standing?


16 posted on 03/22/2010 6:24:20 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: a real Sheila

Seems to me the expansion of medicaid and the usurpation of insurance regulation constitute legal standing.


18 posted on 03/22/2010 6:29:55 AM PDT by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: a real Sheila

do we have legal standing now to challenge his citizenship now that Obama has (will) signed a bill that MANDATES we buy health insurance


22 posted on 03/22/2010 6:37:24 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: a real Sheila

How can any citizen of the United States of America have “no legal standing” with our own Supreme Court? That makes no sense whatsoever, but it is merely a symptom of the larger malady.

As for calling a constitutional convention, be careful what you wish for. We have a great constitution with an amendment process that works; we merely need to hold our elected officials to the letter and spirit of it.

My fears for a new constitutional convention are twofold: one, that the Saul Alinsky crowd will show up in droves to overload the proceedings, bogging it down with rhetoric and procedure, or simply intimidating our representatives in the same way they currently do so.

Second, who here doubts that our rights would be traded for false security in the name of keeping us safe? I can see the first and second amendments, for instance, being chucked out the window in favor of “security” measures. Do not think that “they” would never do that; we never thought that “they” would compel us, through the force of law, to purchase a good or service.

Progressives want a new constitutional convention. They crave it, for they are sure that their tactics would work, yet again, to bring about their ideal state. I am not at all certain the outcome would preserve liberty and the rule of law as we once knew it. We have a constitution; use it.

This is dangerous ground we tread.


32 posted on 03/22/2010 7:20:53 AM PDT by ronnyquest (There's a communist living in the White House! Now, what are you going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson