Posted on 04/07/2010 8:13:56 PM PDT by Chet 99
I suggest you learn to distinguish between potential aggression and actual aggression.
See post 213
And no, what I'm saying is that in this case it may not have been an attack at all.
The injury may not have been the result of aggression.
See post 75
I like the way you think!
But all we’re doing *is* ~thinking~...maybe that’s why we have “differing opinions”....;D
You are ignorant. I cannot believe the animosity that people have for this breed. If you have ever spent the time to get to know a dog of this breed you would realize how gentle they actually are. Yes, they were originally bred to fight, but if you do a little homework you would realize that the reason they were bred to fight is because they would not turn on their handlers. They were bred specifically to have zero human aggression. When a dog of this breed exhibits human aggression it is because they have been severely abused or mishandled by incompetent owners. These dogs are quite possibly the most loyal breed in existence. Please do not help the media to perpetuate the stereotype and damn this breed. This being said, I am the owner of an American Staffordshire Terrier and a Pit Bull mix. I have a 12 year old daughter and another child on the way. These dogs would lay down their lives for my daughter, but I would NEVER leave them alone with the new baby. I have half a brain. These dogs acted on centuries of instinct that cannot be bred out of them. This is the same thing they would do to another dog in the wild to protect their bloodline. If anyone is at fault here it is the person that left the child unattended. But it is too early and too little information is available to make that judgement.
I just watched it,hated it a bunch of hippies trying to save the world...
Very anti American and very anti war...
Strange, this is the first time I've seen you make this claim.
Yes, Thanks for raising awareness about these dangerous dogs. (Sarc)
While were at it how about these dangerous dogs.
http://www.igorilla.com/gorilla/animal/2001/pomeranian.html
Just remember if you think this way it is like saying it’s the gun not the owner.
I don't know how many times it needs to be pointed out, but again, the analogy you use is flawed for one very obvious reason: a gun does not attack without command of its owner. To put it more bluntly, my gun never took off down the street all by itself and mauled some kids face.
Emotionalism for your cause has taken over your reason.
Are you being funny. I would hate to think you are being serious. Maybe I missed the sarcasm in your post. If so, you have my apology. If you are serious, you have my sympathy.
Are you being funny. I would hate to think you are being serious. Maybe I missed the sarcasm in your post. If so, you have my apology. If you are serious, you have my sympathy.
Sorry for the double post. Forgot to add the pic of the viscious pomeranian at the link you provided.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.