Why don't we find recent mammalian mega fauna fossilized to the same extent? Why, in other words, to dinosaur bones invariably look OLDER and more fossilized than those bones of more modern mammalian mega fauna?
Why the disparity, how do you explain why every dinosaur bone looks like it was mineralized for so much longer than, say, an elephants bones?
You don't seem to grasp what a “theory” means. Biblical apologetics as to how a god could lie and make starlight from objects that never even existed within the last six thousand years is not a theory, it is apologetics.
Do you know the difference between a scientific theory and Biblical apologetics?
What I'm saying is, maybe bone fossilization takes 2,000 years or something like that, and the dinosaurs died out 4,000 years ago. So all their bones would be fossilized by now. Mammals on the other hand are still around in large numbers.
Biblical apologetics as to how a god could lie and make starlight from objects that never even existed within the last six thousand years is not a theory, it is apologetics.
I think you're the one who is not understanding. As I said that's not what his theory says at all. The stars were there in the last 6,000 years. Starlight and Time is a completely scientific analysis, using Relativity Theory.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Russell_Humphreys
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-starlight-prove