Posted on 04/21/2010 1:29:45 PM PDT by Battle Hymn of the Republic
A flawed McAfee antivirus update sent enterprise administrators scrambling today as the new signatures quarantined a crucial Windows system file, crippling an unknown number of Windows XP computers, according to messages on the company's support forum.
The forum has since gone offline.
(Excerpt) Read more at networkworld.com ...
Of coure it wouldn’t. Even if you ran McAfee this update still wouldn’t bother you because it is deleting a core component of Windows Xp. FWIW It doesn’t effect Vista or Win7.
this would be a bad, bad day to be a System Admin for a company that bought McAfee
McAfee was a resource hog, and I've had to clean up problems on friends' PC's caused by Norton, although I'd pick Norton over McAfee.
Looks like that should be the free one (Alwil Software Avast Free 5.0.396) misses 3.7%, not just 0.7%.
That depends on what you are using for a browser. Never use IE.
Actually, the most insidious things I've heard of have been bugs in Adobe Reader and WinZip. If you open the wrong file with an unpatched version of either of those, you are owned. I don't use either of them. For PDFs, I use Foxit on Windows and Preview or the Firefox PDF plugin on the Mac. And I use 7-Zip on Windows for zip files and other types of archives. Easier to use, compresses better, and is secure.
I have a box with Ubuntu. Every time I boot it there are about 50 updates waiting to load. Does that happen to you too?
I run an XP VM within Win7 to get to my corporate net. It’s still chugging along but I did just now backup my VM files so I can restore my VM to this point if need be.
Avira is better and it’s free. Check out the tests showing Avira beating both Norton and McAfee.
“Avast” is not “Avira,” but both are free.
The Avira tested is effectively identical to the free Avira, but you don’t get their “Webguard” (it restricts you from bad sites) or their “EmailScanner” (it performs the check on email as they come in rather than when the payload executes).
I think you are getting the names confused.
This is the free version of Avira:
I just noticed they don’t actively mention it on their current website when you click on the Home area. They used to, but I fear too many weren’t paying for the upgraded versions.
That said, there is one annoyance with the free one—when it updates the software, an ad for Avira pops up in a browser window. You click on “Okay” and it’s gone.
I was able to get the next version up for 25% off, so I upgraded recently and got rid of the once-a-day ad.
Much better choices: Avira ...
When I run comprehensive anti-spyware/anti-virus testing every 3 months or so, I use Adaware, AVG, Avira, Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool, and SpyBot.
For day-to-day, I run Avira on the machine, along with Zone Alarm. Used to use AVG day-to-day, but Version 9 seems to have bogged down my ‘puter [still use it every 3 months though].
See...this is an example of the idiot Apple guy that gives apple users a bad name.
ping
Spybot is good. Check out SpywareBlaster also. It prevents the files from ever getting downloaded. It’s not a scan tool, but a preventative one.
If you use a browser you are at risk.
A speaker from trend reported 100,000 new malware signatures were released every day. I’d imagine those comparisons depend a lot on when they were tested.
McAffee/Norton is to virus protection what the BATF is to law enforcement.
Over-armed, hyper-charged, over-zealous, and totally unnecessary.
Use MS Essentials. Free, no hassles, no bloat.
Thank you for-q-clinton
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.