You made some good points then: Well, it could be that, but there are those who believe that once a person is saved and becomes a “true” Christian©, that person, no matter how vile his sins are afterward, he is still saved in the loving arms of the Lord, so it’s not important if a “true” Christian© commits such acts, so they should be ignored.
And I want to add, not this again.
My goodness you are just stuck on the same refrain. It matters not a whit that your assumptions of unbridled sin committed by those who are born again with out consequences is wrong. It matters not a whit that you have been given reasons why your assumption is wrong, you just continue to repeat it.
As I have said before I do not believe you are actually interested in a dialog but only interested in formulating your next question/charge against those who are born again, so because of that there is no point in continuing any attempt at a dialog with you.
And how many of those who are constantly finding ways to attack and denigrate The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are doing exactly what you accuse me of?
How many of them are interested in dialog?
I have tried to dialog here, but I quickly realized that dialog with Colofornian and his type is completely out of the question. When the other thing they have to say about Mormons and Mormonism are how vile and evil they are, where is there any dialog in that?
They say that they aren’t against Mormons, that it’s “Mormonism” they are against, yet I have to see a single positive article they have posted about any Mormons, they just post articles about bad Mormons and things those evil, vile, paganistic, corrupt, wicked, unprincipled, shameless, degenerate, and perverted Mormons do.
Honestly svcw, this is all I hear from them. They refuse to dialog with me from the very beginning, so why are you accusing me of refusing to open up to two-way communication.
I posted an article about some of the problems Evangelicals have with the way they approach Mormons and Mormonism and I didn’t say that Evangelicals were wrong, I just mentioned that they need to change their arguments and how they argue their points, like was mentioned in the article, and I just got an earful of how evil we Mormons are. The one of the very few who really even made an attempt to “discuss” the article was somebody who told me that it was an old article (It was printed back in the ‘90s.) and was therefore out of date. I found that rather humorous some most of the article this person get their info from that they post on this forum is way older than that article.
One person even tried to use the argument that one of the authors wasn’t even Evangelical any more. Okay, does that disqualify the article automatically, especially since he is still very much a member of a mainstream Christian denomination (from what I understand.)and the other author is still Evangelical?