Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skr
I want them on the sidewalks, too. An automobile is far deadlier to a bicycle than a bicycle is to a pedestrian.

Dead is dead. Unless road conditions are very extreme, providing no right side clearance or highway speeds, bikes belong where they have been for 100 years; on the road with cars. Hazards presented by pedestrians are far more numerous; unpredictability and dogs on leashes being just a few.

Even designated bike paths, on a nice summer day, are far more hazardous than the shoulder of the adjacent road. I'll take my chances with a driver that drives all the time any day, over some lard butt that just pulled his bike out of the garage for the first time all year.

19 posted on 05/11/2010 10:56:38 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Minn

Certainly dead is dead, but how many pedestrians are killed by cyclists compared to cyclists killed by motorists? A bike can stop faster than a car, can dodge (or walk their bikes around) animals and children better than a car can and is less likely to kill the weaker party in a collision.

Not a lot of cars on the road 100 years ago. Times change and so should motorized/non-motorized rules. BTW, I’m all for bike paths that aren’t part of the road.


89 posted on 05/11/2010 12:30:11 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson