Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City requires lingerie store to get food permit for edible undies
KENS5,Com News (San Antone) ^ | 5/18/2010

Posted on 05/19/2010 9:41:31 AM PDT by llevrok

Rosemary Benitez thought it was a joke at first. She was told her store was going to need a food permit in order to stay in business.

But Benitez doesn't own a restaurant. She owns the Shades of Love lingerie store on West Bitters road.

Shades of Love sells racy lingerie, high heel shoes, adult toys and items meant to enhance a couple's sex life. However, some of those items are edible. That's why the health department ruled the store needed a food permit.

The permit costs about $230 a year. It also means the store is subject to regular health inspections.

Beneitez says, "Everything is sold as novelty. Everything in the box says 'novelty item' only... It's not something you sit down and actually eat. It's more for licking and tasting. Edible? No. It's not going to fill you up."

San Antonio's Sanitarian Services Manager, Stephen Barschewski, told us, "Any facility in the city of San Antonio that sells edible substance requires a food establishment permit. One, it's the law. Two, in case there's a recall, we certainly want to know the source."

Beneitez countered back, "I don't think you would actually eat, lick, or taste enough of this that it would cause a big problem (as in food recalls). It's absurd to me."

KENS 5 has learned of other stores, like Dillard's department stores and several auto parts stores, that are also required to have food permits. The reason is because they sell chocolate bars.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; chocolatebars; edibleundies; girlscoutcookies; nannystate; napl; papersplease; revenuetickets; sanantonio; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
The gubmint has their fingers into everything!
1 posted on 05/19/2010 9:41:31 AM PDT by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

tasty undies ping


2 posted on 05/19/2010 9:42:15 AM PDT by llevrok (A stranger in my own country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

What are they tuna flavored ?


3 posted on 05/19/2010 9:42:57 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Here's the real issue:

The permit costs about $230 a year.

4 posted on 05/19/2010 9:43:11 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Slings and Arrows

Panty Ping


5 posted on 05/19/2010 9:43:40 AM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Nom nom nom


6 posted on 05/19/2010 9:43:49 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Stop the change - I want to get off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
"City requires lingerie store to get food permit for edible undies"

Um...What?...?...

7 posted on 05/19/2010 9:44:23 AM PDT by Lobsterback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Yep ... that's it.

Packaged tasties ... does selling a pack of gum require a food permit?

8 posted on 05/19/2010 9:44:36 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Yep, I often wonder how many Carbs could be avoided by sticking with those Cotton or Rayon thongs.

Do the Large and X-Large pairs count as 2 servings?


9 posted on 05/19/2010 9:44:59 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

If the govt is forcing this, I’d personally just stop selling them to avoid the license. Unless of course she’s selling thousands of dollars of these a year, then it might be worth it to have the license.

Either way the government is stupid as ass.


10 posted on 05/19/2010 9:45:19 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Well that ought to balance the city’s budget! ;-)


11 posted on 05/19/2010 9:45:31 AM PDT by Dem Guard ("We're Coming to Take You Away")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Probably


12 posted on 05/19/2010 9:46:54 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Yep. Money and control. Synonym for Big Government.


13 posted on 05/19/2010 9:47:00 AM PDT by FourPeas (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

Don’t give them any ideas.


14 posted on 05/19/2010 9:47:47 AM PDT by FourPeas (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Nice double entendre!


15 posted on 05/19/2010 9:48:04 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

Not just big, any. It’s the nature of the beast.


16 posted on 05/19/2010 9:48:27 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

“I’m glad they don’t make them things in biscuits and gravy flavor, or I’d get fat on underbritches alone!” - Larry the Cable Guy


17 posted on 05/19/2010 9:48:43 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Solution: relabel them. Perhaps “lickable” or “sweet”? This is simply government graft and should be dodged with the same lack of scruples as when the license fee was imposed.


18 posted on 05/19/2010 9:51:59 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Heard she’s selling crabs, too.


19 posted on 05/19/2010 9:52:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

That bites.


20 posted on 05/19/2010 9:52:39 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson