Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: padre35

Agreed...The enviros say wolves are a part of the eco system but with the numbers of humans in the lower 48 they are not needed and that system has gotten along just fine without them for 70 or 80 years.


6 posted on 05/30/2010 4:07:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

The ecosystem gets along quite well without wolves.

Only the insane, or the academented, claim wolves are a better method of controlling herbivore populations than hunters.

Only the warped and perverted would prefer to have deer and elk slowly eaten alive by wolves. Yes, Virginia, wolves have to eat them alive because they are too small to kill rapidly and with mercy as do hunters.

The crucial issue is the use of “Endangered Species” alleged need for ‘critical habitat’ to justify the socialization of America.

Hunters pay to kill off surplus animals.

Wolves cost megabucks to do a far less controlled killing.

Think of a wolf pack not as loose cannons, but as “bloodthirsty beasts of the field.”

Such terms were good enough for the conversations between G*d and Moses.

Good enough for them is good enough for me.


7 posted on 05/30/2010 4:19:24 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson