Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Genoa

There was of course the option of respecting the self-determination of the Southern people, especially considering it was no different then that exercised in the 1770s.

But Lincoln couldn’t get that because he was hellbent on power and couldn’t stand the thought that anyone didn’t want to be under his benevolent rule.


62 posted on 06/15/2010 2:31:20 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: AzaleaCity5691

In the 1770s the American people had no representation in the British government. In contrast the southern people had pretty much controlled the American government from 1800 until Lincoln’s election.

Then the Slavers threw a hissy fit and provoked a war which cost 600,000 lives. They destroyed their homeland over their addiction to slavery. Smart boys.


101 posted on 06/15/2010 8:31:03 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson