[fish hawk]

I quit reading at “ we know the data is flawed”. No we don't. Can you post a large amount of flawed data. I don't know of any. You mentioned earlier about a Lab that did something and it was quoted as a Pit Bull. Okay, that's one. You got hundreds more? Your whole argument is bias crap.

[AnAmericanMother]

Let me rephrase that. The data is not flawed - the data is nonexistent. The plural of anecdote is not data, and the news reports are simply anecdotal. We don't even know who identified the breed of the dogs.

You are relying on news reports that we know have changed over time to report only certain breeds. And news reports are not the same as properly collected data from hospitals, police reports, and vets. We know the news reports are not telling the whole story, because I personally know of dog bites by other breeds that are not reported at all in the news. Just extrapolate that, and you have a major problem.

See also the post immediately above.

This is the second time you have "quit reading" before examining the facts. That's the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and singing, "La la la, I can't hear you."