Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2010 7:53:41 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: opentalk
"Any doubt that the woman who once stated that "whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs" is anything other than a radical leftist?"

Why does this make her a leftist? This is the long standing constitutional position with regard to free speech. It is why you can't falsely shout fire in a crowed theater or committ defamation, libel or slander with impunity. As with every single constitutional right, there is a balancing test.

2 posted on 07/06/2010 8:04:30 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk
In a NUT shell. The Prez and Congress are the Nuts!

When you stick your hand in your pocket, wallet or purse you are beginning the "Commerce Action". According to those Idjets they have the duty and right to determine how much you have in your pocket, wallet or purse and what you must spend it on.

Healthcare, veggies, and appropriate materiels DEEMED!

Of course Politicians, Prostitues and Porn, (all the same birds of a feather and oily on the gulf), are appropriate commerce!

3 posted on 07/06/2010 8:05:55 AM PDT by Young Werther ("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk
Overturn Wickard v Filburn!

Clarence Thomas gets it.

7 posted on 07/06/2010 8:45:41 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson