This has nothing to do with marriage.
It’s completely and totally irrelevant what different cultures in the world today and throughout history had as marriage customs. Your deflecting the topic and arguing for things that have nothing to do with it is just a smoke screen for having been exposed as not condemning it but condoning it.
And your arguments about that only address the issue of older men with younger girls who aren’t even as young as this boy was. So the FAIL.
What happened was wrong period.
And it’s indefensible.
The fact that you’re not condemning it but trying to find every which way to excuse it shows the depth of depravity of your own mind, along with the posts you posted here.
Only abusers justify their actions by insisting that no harm is done to the victim, that the victims actually enjoy it or want it, that it’s not really wrong because it happens somewhere else in the world or in history, yada, yada, yada.....
We’ve heard arguments like that before from pedophiles.
Talk like a pedophile and you’ll be labeled as one.
BB is right, you’ve revealed a lot of ugliness within yourself.
That sound you hear in the distance is my applause.
“Only abusers justify their actions by insisting that no harm is done to the victim, that the victims actually enjoy it or want it, that it’s not really wrong because it happens somewhere else in the world or in history, yada, yada, yada.....
We’ve heard arguments like that before from pedophiles.
Talk like a pedophile and you’ll be labeled as one.”
Regardless of how nasty you make false claims about someone whom you know nothing about, the question I posed remains unaddressed, let alone answered: Since the present system has failed in its intervention, and since the present system also fails to prevent such abuse - what next?
Please remember that redoubling ones efforts in the fact of failure is a working description of fanaticism.
I really must correct some of your presumptions. I did not write that the teacher/student sex was right, what I asked, numerous times was quantification of damages. No real data was presented, so that ended that inquiry.
I suspect you have a significant emotional investment in the present system’laws. Given that, and your increasing anger and projection, I suggest accepting that we disagree on the need for showing damages in the instant case.
In closing, given the paucity of data supporting damages to the male student’s sexual event, does the possibility of “damage” justify a 20 or 30 year jail bill to the citizenry? Especially, as such sentences clearly have not deterred such offenders?