Skip to comments.Orly Taitz, v.Thomas D. MacDonald 10A56 referred to the Court.
Posted on 08/12/2010 5:25:16 AM PDT by Elderberry
Orly Taitz, Applicant v. Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.
Application (10A56) referred to the Court.
This is the docket number, No. 10A56, for appeal with Justice Thomas (Mac Donald was one of the commanding officers of Connie Rhodes, that is why the original case was called Rhodes v MacDonald et al)
What does it mean that Orly’s case was “referred” to the US Supreme Court on Tuesday?
Orly Taitz, Applicant
Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-15418)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jul 8 2010 Application (10A56) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Jul 15 2010 Application (10A56) denied by Justice Thomas.
Aug 4 2010 Application (10A56) refiled and submitted to Justice Alito.
Aug 10 2010 Application (10A56) referred to the Court.
I think it means that a three or four member panel of SC justices will review the application and determine if there is enough merit to the case to give her a full hearing.
But you need 5 SC justices to agree to hear the case.
> “I think it means that a three or four member panel of SC justices will review the application and determine if there is enough merit to the case to give her a full hearing.” <
I believe you are correct. I think the term is “writ of certiorari” in which the case will be granted a full hearing. Unfortunately, many of the previous case did not get past this point of review.
It means Justice Roberts, or more likely his clerks, will review the case and prepare a synopsis. Then all the justices will review it at their weekly Friday meeting and vote on whether to hear the case. However, since the court is in recess I don’t think anything will happen until the fall.
Did Justice Thomas give a reason for denying her earlier petition?
Justice Thomas gave no reason for denial.
And Orly questions whether he even saw it.
Who’s to say?
Sometimes when in a tricky situation and you have a piece of equipment that won’t run and you have exhausted all efforts trying to to diagnose why and the clock is running out of time a hammer often works.
I hope these judges think in a similar way, they are aware America just won’t start back up, its been pushed, jumpstarted and analyzed buy “experts” but it still just won’t turn over.
I fervently believe at this very moment that if Obama were to resign, to step down from being POTUS we would see immediate recovery efforts.
Orly Taitz may very well be the hammer to make it all work, let her go to court.
It blows my mind that snail darter and hoot owl and ten commandments cases all see their days in court.
But not this issue.
There is a difference between destroying the country and saving the country...
Well Kagan had a hand in that I believe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.