To: JoeProBono
3 officers to take care of a non-violent problem at a Starbucks?
Wow.
3 posted on
08/16/2010 11:57:28 PM PDT by
Anvilhead
(Dammit Jim, I'm an American not an American't.)
To: Anvilhead
3 officers to take care of a non-violent problem at a Starbucks?Well, you never know till you get there whether there's going to be some dogs that need dispatched.
14 posted on
08/17/2010 12:08:46 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Anvilhead
17 posted on
08/17/2010 12:10:10 AM PDT by
stormer
To: Anvilhead
22 posted on
08/17/2010 12:12:20 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
To: Anvilhead
3 officers to take care of a non-violent problem at a Starbucks?
Starbucks: The new Dunkin' Donuts. (Get it? They were already there...)
78 posted on
08/17/2010 4:44:52 AM PDT by
Quality_Not_Quantity
(A half-truth masquerading as the whole truth becomes a complete untruth. (J.I. Packer)
To: Anvilhead
Can’t have “unreasonable” customers.
109 posted on
08/17/2010 7:40:07 AM PDT by
whence911
(Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
To: Anvilhead
She is lucky she did not get tazed and shot multiple times.
113 posted on
08/17/2010 7:45:40 AM PDT by
going hot
(Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
To: Anvilhead
3 officers to take care of a non-violent problem at a Starbucks? Safer than going after a crackhead or other violent offender.
Maybe they could even write a revenue ticket for disturbing the peace.
139 posted on
08/17/2010 10:56:34 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Those who support the construction of the WTC mosque oppose Christian missionaries working abroad.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
