Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cothrige

Sarah Palin would have, but McCain wouldn’t let her.

I suspect that Soros told him to roll over and die or Soros would make an electronic run on the bank that would destroy the economy of the entire western world.

And Alan Keyes and another candidate asked the questions. The courts blew them off. That’s where we’re at right now. Lawless.

But right now anybody who has been harmed by Obama “acting as President” when only Joe Biden can Constitutionally do so has standing to sue. It doesn’t have to be somebody harmed by the election, because the prohibition against Obama having the presidential powers extends beyond the election or any point since.

Because Obama had not “qualified” by Jan 20, 2009 the Constitution only allows Joe Biden to “act as President” -act as CIC, nominate SCOTUS justices, issue presidential orders, sign or veto bills, authorize a court-martial, appoint cabinet members, etc.

Anybody who has suffered particularized harm which can be remedied by the courts has standing to sue the government for the actions of this POTUS who is forbidden by the Constitution from having the presidential powers.


35 posted on 08/22/2010 7:33:02 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
Sarah Palin would have, but McCain wouldn’t let her.

Yes, I believe you are probably right about that. She would almost certainly have been willing to address the question. Whatever one may think of her she is not a coward.

And Alan Keyes and another candidate asked the questions. The courts blew them off. That’s where we’re at right now. Lawless.

Yes he did, but I don't think his voice was very well heard in the election.

But right now anybody who has been harmed by Obama “acting as President” when only Joe Biden can Constitutionally do so has standing to sue.

I don't think so. That would spread standing too far for the courts. They would never concede to it. I really do think that only Congress is in a position to act on this, and we all know they won't.

And what about the de facto officer doctrine. It would seem to specifically apply to this situation, and that would mean that all of Obama's decisions and acts would still apply even if he were found to be unqualified.


42 posted on 08/22/2010 7:56:59 PM PDT by cothrige
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

I know you’ve followed this situation closely. Has anyone checked into the this court? http://www.cit.uscourts.gov/informational/about.htm#JURISDICTION

“This legislation will offer the international trade community, as well as domestic interests, consumer groups, labor organizations, and other concerned citizens, a vastly improved forum for judicial review of administrative actions of government agencies dealing with importations.

It would seem that once Obama signed anything regarding international trade, the game could be on? I’m even thinking some of the tariffs could apply and China does not have to be the plaintiff? An amicus brief?

Grabbing at straws, I know, but the idea intrigues me...


70 posted on 08/23/2010 12:12:26 AM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson